第九问:我们应该给年轻人怎么样的教育?
72问皮埃罗 / 硅谷的秘密
第九问:我们应该给年轻人怎么样的教育?

第九问:我们应该给年轻人怎么样的教育?

导语:

感谢大家订阅皮埃罗·斯加鲁菲(Piero Scaruffi)的钛媒体72问.知识专栏《硅谷的秘密》。我是今天的提问者赵何娟。在上一课中,皮埃罗批判了彼得·蒂尔的“教育无用论”,并直言,如果你想要从事技术行业,你就必须接受教育,而且必须要能够终身学习,那么我们应该给年轻人什么样的教育呢?

正文:

Now the discussion we can have again is what kind of education they should give you. So that's why I think being creative is so important and it's not only me . Stanford there are more than twenty programs about creating, about interdisciplinary education, so realize that the future is not specialist. You can be,you can be but it's dangerous to be a specialist in one thing and not knowing anything about the rest, very dangerous. Today you are studying biotech, you convince the future but five years from now neuroscience discover something and the future becomes something else. so if you have an interdisciplinary education and they taught you also have to be creative. Then you'll be okay I think you'll be doing very well. My opinion is that in the future there will be very good jobs.

我们现在的问题是,我们应该给予年轻人何种教育?所以我们需要具有创造性思维,这非常重要。这不单是我的看法,斯坦福大学现在也有多个跨学科的课程。学生会知道,未来的社会分工会模糊起来,你不能只做一个领域的专家,不了解该领域之外的内容,不然就有被淘汰的风险。今天,如果你是生物科学的学生,你只学习自己专业的内容,五年之后,神经科学有了新的发现,那么你的工作也会受到影响。如果你学习跨学科的知识,又有创造力,那你就会做得非常好,未来会有很好的工作。

That's also misleading that the media that is misleading. They always scare people with this idea that in the future there will be no jobs or the jobs will be horrible. The opposite. I was going to build all these robots and if robots become more intelligent who's going to build intelligent robots who is going to control them and this will require more skills not less skills it you really see today I mean it's anybody who is in that artificial intelligence is paid twice, not half,. 

说到这里,我想要批评媒体,媒体经常说未来没有工作岗位了,又或者说未来的工作岗位会很可怕。事实相反,我们未来会有很智能的机器人,那么谁来制作更加高端的机器人呢?又有谁能控制这些机器人?这就要求人拥有多种技能了。今天做人工智能的工程师的工作是其他人的两倍。

Now you get you need more and more skills and that will be the same in the future and you have to be very creative to understand the how to control a society, how to work in a society of intelligent machines. The more intelligent the machine the more intelligent people have to be. So the people are left behind, clocked. In the United States we had this dramatic problem of all these nice people who didn't want to go to school, it's a bitter field. People didn't want to go to school they spend their life, with humble jobs. The very nice people they have a family children. I have nothing against them but now they're all desperate because their jobs disappearing. 

在未来,你还需要具有创造力,知道如何控制人工智能的社会,如何在这个社会中工作,机器越是智能化,人就要越聪明。所以,跟不上社会潮流的人就会被淘汰。今天在美国,有很多好人不愿意上学,他们所做的工作收入微薄,还需要养家糊口。我没有歧视他们的意思,但是他们现在年纪大了,开始觉得绝望,因为他们的工作消失了。

Who needs the factory workers so many of these jobs, of course is disappearing when the machines can do the same thing they can do it better twenty four hours a day. Why should I use you? You know you should be building the machine,  not trying to compete with the machine. So this problem. It's already here and not the paradox. We have this millions of people they don't want to study and now they are competing with the machine. Of course, the machine wins. It’s cheaper and doesn't break, doesn't get sick.

谁需要工厂工人?这种工作岗位正在消失。机器可以完成这种工作,而且还可以连续工作7天24小时不停歇。为什么要雇你?你需要学习如何控制这些机器,而不是和机器竞争。这很矛盾。美国有很多人不愿意学习,他们现在就要和机器抢饭碗。毫无疑问,机器完胜。因为机器更便宜,不会生病。

And at the same time, in Silicon Valley we desperately needed more people to build those machines. I mean we are we are getting immigrants from alone the world we are extremely upset with a stupid president we have now that wants to block immigration. We need more and more when we did want more students from China, more from India, more from everybody. You know on one hand you have millions of people didn’t study, they are losing their jobs. 

同时,在硅谷,我们极其需要人才要发明机器,我们非常需要移民。但是我们对现任的愚蠢总统都感到非常不满,因为他在禁止移民入境。我们需要更多移民,更多来自中国、印度的移民。美国有很多人不愿意学习,由此失业。

But at the same time we are creating so many jobs and we are willing to pay a lot of money, how can these people not to realize? It’s crazy. There are jobs, there are so many even some of the kids grew up in Silicon Valley they grew up there. Is it possible that today you work in McDonald’s.  So my opinion is actually opposite of his opinion my opinion you have to convince people to go to school and stay in school for a long time.

但是与此同时,我们也创造出了更多的就业岗位。在硅谷我们非常愿意花钱去请那些人才过来工作,为什么这些人就没有意识到问题呢?我们有很多工作岗位。有些人在硅谷长大,为什么最终他们会要在麦当劳工作呢?我的观点和他的相反,我们要上学,不断学习,长期学习。

【版权归钛媒体所有,未经许可不得转载】

分享课程:
大家都在学
72问 有声书系列 / 中国经济2021
精品小课 阿里人力资源体系课
精品小课 阿里巴巴政委体系课
  • 回复

    跨学科的课程,中国教育真的要逐步建立起来。不过现在高中生文理不分家就是很好的开始。

    2018-05-25 23:50 via iphone

Oh! no

您是否确认要删除该条评论吗?

全部课程 ( 91 )
倒序播放
加载更多

00:00
/
00:00
X1.0

注册邮箱未验证

我们已向下方邮箱发送了验证邮件,请查收并按提示验证您的邮箱。

如果您没有收到邮件,请留意垃圾邮件箱。

更换邮箱

您当前使用的邮箱可能无法接收验证邮件,建议您更换邮箱

账号合并

经检测,你是“钛媒体”和“商业价值”的注册用户。现在,我们对两个产品因进行整合,需要您选择一个账号用来登录。无论您选择哪个账号,两个账号的原有信息都会合并在一起。对于给您造成的不便,我们深感歉意。